Home › Resources › Baby led weaning vs purees Australia: an honest mum's guide

Baby led weaning vs purees Australia: an honest mum's guide

The BLW vs purees debate is loud online. Here is what actually happened at our kitchen table, and why the answer is probably simpler than you think.

By Karen · Kiddo Kitchen · 9 min read

Before I had kids, I had opinions. Strong ones. I was going to do baby led weaning vs purees properly, whichever side I landed on, and I was going to do it with conviction. Then Luca (now 6) arrived, and somewhere between the fourth load of washing and the third night feed, my conviction quietly packed its bags and left. When it came to introducing solids in Australia, I stopped asking which method was right and started asking which method would actually work on a Tuesday evening when everyone was exhausted.

If you are currently deep in the baby led weaning vs purees Australia research spiral, I want you to take a breath. This article is not going to tell you what to do. It is going to tell you what both approaches actually look like, what the research says, what I did with two very different boys, and why the answer for most families lands somewhere comfortably in the middle.

First, a small reframe that genuinely matters. Most of us search for "BLW vs purees" because that is how the topic is talked about online, but the more accurate question is BLW vs traditional spoon feeding. Purees are a food texture, not a feeding philosophy. What actually distinguishes the two approaches is who is in charge of the spoon. With baby led weaning, the baby leads the speed, the discovery and the movement. With traditional weaning, the parent loads the spoon and guides it. And here is the bit most people miss: purees can absolutely be part of a baby led weaning approach. The parent loads up a soft spoon and hands it over, and from there the baby takes it to their mouth (or their cheek, or the dog). That nuance is what we are going to come back to throughout this article.

What is baby led weaning, exactly?

Baby led weaning (BLW) is an approach to starting solids where your baby skips being spoon-fed and goes straight to handling food themselves. Instead of you loading a spoon and guiding it into their mouth, you put appropriately prepared food in front of them and let them get on with it. The chaos that follows is entirely their doing, and entirely the point.

According to the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, BLW allows babies from around six months of age to self-feed with finger foods and family-style meals rather than being spoon-fed. The key word there is around. Your baby needs to show signs of developmental readiness before you start, regardless of which approach you choose.

Those readiness signs are worth knowing because they apply to both approaches. Look for a baby who can sit upright with minimal support, has lost the tongue-thrust reflex that pushes food back out, shows genuine interest in what is on your plate (Theo, now 3, was stealing avocado off mine at five months, which was enthusiastic but slightly ahead of schedule), and can bring objects to their mouth with reasonable coordination.

BLW is not all-or-nothing. Most Australian families who try it end up doing a version of it alongside spoon feeding, and that is completely fine.

And what does traditional spoon feeding look like?

Traditional weaning, sometimes called parent-led weaning, is what most of us grew up watching our parents do. You start with smooth, runny purees around six months (and not before four months, as Raising Children Network makes clear), then gradually increase texture through mashed foods, minced foods, soft finger foods, and eventually family meals. By twelve months, your baby should be eating around three small meals a day alongside breast milk or formula.

You are in control of the pace and the spoon. Your baby signals fullness and hunger with body language and you respond accordingly. It is methodical, it lets you track exactly what has gone in, and it gives a lot of new parents a sense of reassurance that their baby is actually eating something rather than mostly redecorating the highchair tray.

The trade-off is that it does require separate food preparation, at least initially. You are cooking and pureeing while the rest of the family eats something else entirely, which adds time to an already busy season of life. And if you do not move through textures fairly quickly, some babies become resistant to chunkier foods later on, so progression matters.

The honest case for baby led weaning

The strongest argument for BLW is the one parents feel most viscerally at the dinner table: your baby eats what the family eats, when the family eats. You put a piece of steamed sweet potato or a strip of soft cooked meat on the tray, you sit down, and everyone eats together. At its best, it is genuinely lovely.

There are developmental benefits worth taking seriously too. Letting babies self-feed from the beginning builds fine motor skills, hand-eye coordination, and an early sense of autonomy around food. Babies who manage a range of textures early tend to be more comfortable with varied foods as toddlers, though I would note that Luca was a cautious, methodical eater regardless of what we offered, so no method is a guarantee of an adventurous three-year-old.

BLW babies also tend to get to the point of cleanly self-feeding faster than babies who have been spoon-fed throughout, simply because they get more practice. Hours of fist-grabbing carrot and exploring the texture of a banana add up.

Some parents also report calmer mealtimes and a more relaxed relationship with food generally, which makes sense when you consider that babies are setting their own pace rather than being encouraged to finish a predetermined portion. That responsiveness to hunger and fullness cues is something worth protecting early.

The honest downside? Mess. So much mess. The first few months of BLW you will find yoghurt in places yoghurt has no business being. Hair, ears, the gap between the highchair and the wall. You need to be willing to ride that out, because it does ease as their coordination develops.

The honest case for traditional spoon feeding

Here is the thing nobody says loudly enough in the BLW-enthusiast corners of the internet: traditional spoon feeding is genuinely great. It is not a compromise or a lesser option. It is how most of the world introduces solids, there is decades of evidence behind it, and it solves a specific, important problem: iron.

By around six months, babies' iron stores from pregnancy begin to deplete. Raising Children Network is clear that iron-rich foods need to be a priority from the moment solids begin, and the Better Health Channel notes that babies' iron stores run low in the second half of their first year, which is exactly when iron-rich solids matter most. Pureed meat, lentils, and iron-fortified cereals are genuinely easy to get into a baby via spoon in ways that can be harder to guarantee when your baby is in charge of picking up finger foods and mostly throwing them at the dog.

Spoon feeding also lets you know exactly what went in. When the parent is in charge of the spoon, you have far better quantity control than you do when a baby is squishing broccoli into their fist. When Luca was starting solids and I was anxious about his intake (first-time parent, spreadsheet-level anxiety), being able to see that he had eaten four teaspoons of pumpkin and lentil was enormously reassuring. That measurability is not nothing. It is a real advantage for parents who are managing worry alongside everything else.

And for some babies, traditional spoon feeding is genuinely the safer path. Premature babies, those with developmental delays, or babies with certain neurological conditions may not have the readiness cues for finger foods at six months. If you are in any doubt about your baby's individual situation, a conversation with your GP, child health nurse, or paediatrician is absolutely the right move.

Traditional spoon feeding is not a lesser option. It is how most of the world introduces solids, and it solves a specific, important problem: iron.

Where purees fit in a baby led weaning approach

This is the bit most people miss, and it is genuinely worth understanding. Baby led weaning is not anti-puree. It is anti-someone-else-controlling-the-spoon. I have not seen this nuance explained much in the Australian parenting resources I have read, and it is the single bit of information that changed how I thought about feeding both my boys.

In a BLW approach, the parent can still load up a soft spoon with puree (an iron-rich blend of meat and sweet potato, say), then hand the loaded spoon directly to the baby. From that point, the baby is in charge. They lift the spoon themselves, work out the angle, find their mouth (eventually), and feed themselves. The food is still a smooth puree. The control has just shifted.

This matters for two reasons. First, it solves the iron worry that puts a lot of parents off BLW entirely, because you are still able to offer iron-rich purees as a meaningful part of the diet. Second, it gives babies the autonomy and motor practice that BLW is really about. The MashMunch Spoons were designed exactly for this. The shallow bowl holds onto the puree while a small fist works out how to navigate it, and the soft tip is gentle on developing gums.

A loaded-spoon BLW approach gives you the best of both. Iron-rich purees on the menu. Baby still in charge of getting them in.

Can we talk about choking? Because everyone is thinking about it

This is the thing that stops more parents trying BLW than anything else. The fear is completely understandable. Watching a baby gag on food is alarming every single time, even when you know it is coming.

So here is the distinction that changed everything for me: gagging and choking are not the same thing. Gagging is loud. It is your baby's gag reflex doing exactly what it is designed to do, which is moving food forward and out when it sits too far back. It sounds awful. It looks awful. It is actually normal and protective. Choking is different. Choking is silent. A choking baby cannot cough, cannot cry, and needs immediate help.

Gagging is loud and normal. Choking is silent and serious. Knowing the difference is one of the most useful things you can learn before starting solids.

The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network notes that choking is a risk with any method of introducing solids, not specific to BLW. What matters is developmental readiness, safe food preparation, and always supervising your baby while they eat. Foods should be soft enough to squish between your fingers, cut appropriately, and free from hard, round, or stringy elements that present genuine hazards regardless of method.

Before you start solids, in any form, it is worth doing a first aid course or refreshing your infant choking response knowledge. St John Ambulance Australia runs an online Caring for Kids course aimed at parents, grandparents and carers, and many local community centres run face-to-face versions for new parents too. It is one of those things you genuinely hope you never need, but it makes you feel an enormous amount calmer at the dinner table.

Baby led weaning vs purees: what we actually did

I started Luca on purees. He was six months, I was a first-time designer-turned-parent with a colour-coded weaning schedule and genuine opinions about iron-fortified rice cereal. He ate beautifully off a spoon and stared at finger foods like they were a personal affront. We introduced them slowly, around seven months, and he eventually became comfortable with them. He is six now and eats almost everything. The system worked.

Theo was different. Theo watched us eat from approximately five months with an expression of barely suppressed outrage that we were not including him. By six months he was grabbing whatever was within reach. We still started with some purees because iron mattered and I was not leaving that to chance, but we introduced finger foods much earlier and much more confidently the second time around. His relationship with food has always been enthusiastic and slightly reckless, which is very on-brand for Theo generally.

What we did with both boys, here in Brisbane, was a combination approach, even if I did not have a name for it at the time. Purees for iron-rich foods and certainty. Finger foods for independence, texture exposure, and family mealtimes. A preloaded spoon handed to them so they could technically feed themselves while I technically knew what went in. Flexible, responsive, and far less stressful than picking a team and sticking to it rigidly.

How to make both approaches work in practice

If you are doing traditional spoon feeding, progress your textures fairly quickly. Smooth is a starting point, not a destination. By around eight months, move through mashed, minced, and chopped textures with soft pieces of food alongside. Waiting too long to introduce lumps and texture can make later transitions harder. And vary your flavours early. A baby who only ever eats blended carrot is going to be considerably more suspicious of everything else down the track. For a detailed guide on what to offer at each stage, see our first foods for babies guide.

For spoon feeding, having the right equipment makes a real difference. The MashMunch Spoons are designed specifically for babies learning to eat, with a shallow bowl and soft tip that makes early spoon feeding more comfortable for little mouths. They are also chewable, which matters during teething when your baby is primarily interested in biting whatever comes near their face.

If you are doing BLW or combination feeding, the squish test is your best friend. If you can squish a piece of food flat between your thumb and index finger with gentle pressure, it is generally safe for a baby's gums to manage. If it resists, it needs more cooking time or a different preparation. Soft strips are easier to hold than small chunks at the beginning, because babies will use their whole fist before they develop a pincer grip.

For batch cooking families doing either approach, having a good system for prepping and storing food takes the pressure off weeknight mealtimes enormously. Steaming and blending a week's worth of purees on a Sunday, then portioning them into the freezer, means you are not scrambling for options when everyone is hungry and tired at 5pm. The KiddoKook Pro steams, blends, reheats, and self-cleans in a single appliance, which is genuinely useful when you are trying to get food ready while also entertaining a baby who has decided the dog's water bowl is the most interesting thing in the house. See our full homemade baby food guide for a complete Sunday session walkthrough.

Is your baby ready? Signs to look for before you start

Developmental readiness matters more than a calendar date. Most babies show these signs around six months, but individual variation is completely normal. Solids should not start before four months under any circumstances, as younger babies' digestive systems are simply not ready.

Look for a baby who can sit upright with minimal support, though they do not need to be completely independent. A baby who has lost or is losing the tongue-thrust reflex, which automatically pushes things out of the mouth in early months. A baby who shows genuine interest in food at mealtimes, opening their mouth, leaning forward, or eyeing off your dinner with what can only be described as longing. And a baby who can move objects to their mouth with reasonable coordination, which is particularly relevant if you are planning a BLW approach.

If your baby was born prematurely, use their corrected age rather than their birth age when assessing readiness. And if anything feels uncertain, your child health nurse or GP is the right person to talk to before you start.

Ready to make starting solids a little easier?

However you approach it, starting solids gets less terrifying with every meal. The first time is chaotic. By week three it is just Tuesday. The KiddoKook Pro steams, blends, reheats, defrosts and self-cleans in one appliance. 30-day risk-free trial. Same-day dispatch on orders before 11am.

Shop the KiddoKook Pro